The Royal Touch
Historical
Context of a Ritual Mentality
For royal ceremonies, the
European monarchies, particularly those of France and
England, perpetuated in a new key the medieval ritual
expressions of Christian sanctity, while Renaissance Italy
added strikingly new artistic and theatrical effects and
iconologies. Many early modern Europeans held the medieval
belief of the "king's two bodies," that is, kingship was
represented in a unique royal person who possessed both a
natural, mortal body and a mystical, immortal, political
one. According to this belief, the king, in ritual, became
the
intermediary
who joined God's working in the world and his justice with
the preservation of a people as a unique body politic. In
studying the belief in French and English kings' ability to
heal
scrofula
by touching people with the disease, Marc Bloch's
groundbreaking study The
Royal Touch traced how "rather vague ideas" based on a
general belief in the supernatural character of
royalty
"crystallize in the eleventh and twelfth centuries into a
precise and stable institution" that lasted for seven
centuries. The ritual of the royal touch developed into
frequent public demonstrations of the
miraculous
results of coronation rites, in which kings were both
anointed with holy oil and crowned. Bloch traced the
vicissitudes of the ritual among the divergent explanations
of eight centuries of writers. By 1500, the coronation
mattered less than the evidence of the king's unique nature
as a royal person. French kings performed the ritual until
the Revolution; the practice ended in England with the death
of Queen Anne in 1714.
The belief in the power of
the royal touch emphasizes the notion that the king was a
"mixed person"—part sacred and part
layperson.
Although the essentially religious attributes of this notion
are related to the concept of the "king's two bodies," they
should not be confused with it. The latter concept has a
larger scope than the particular
ambience
and rites around the king's person and finds its fullest
development in
juridical
thought and ceremonies that emphasized the king as image or
embodiment of justice: justice being, after truth (religion
in medieval Christian thought), a permanent part of God's
creation. In the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, lawyers,
officials, and corporate bodies claimed rights in this
divine creation according to the notion of legal fictions:
that is, that towns or institutions have rights in law as do
persons. Ceremonies with kings and princes articulated these
rights and mirrored right order in secular titles, offices,
and institutions. Among the people participating in
political life, rituals complemented and represented
constitutional developments over which the
seventeenth-century French were best positioned to assert
hegemony
as model builders. Other national histories took different
turns: in Spain the isolationist policies of the monarchy
starting with Philip II (ruled 1554–1598) prevented foreign
ideas and innovations in state rituals; in Germany
independent imperial principalities limited the spread of
royal ceremonies; in England royal ceremonies took shape
bounded by the weakness of the monarchy and growth of
parliamentary power; in Italy the Habsburgs, papacy, and
princely dynasties favored the new inventions of political
spectacles
over rituals that contained residues of civic traditions;
and throughout Europe Reformation and Counter-Reformation
churches were attentive to maintain the purity of religious
ceremonies from secular pollution. Through symbolic forms
and performances, early modern rituals placed one's sense of
status and civic consciousness within a framework of loyalty
to national monarchy or state identities.
Marc
Bloch. The Royal Touch: Sacred Monarchy and Scrofula in
England and France. Translated by J. E. Anderson.
London, 1973. French publication of 1924 was the first to
move from
apologetics,
polemics, or positivist interpretations of monarchical
customs and ceremonies and apply the insights of
ethnography
and anthropology to interpreting historical sources.
Essential for studying medieval and early modern ceremonies.